EPCIS and CBV for Cold Chain Management

The gateway framing matters for this topic: epcis.dev accepts an event only after validating it against GS1's own schema, stamps the capturing account — capturedBy, the warrantor, kept distinct from who, the attested observer — identifies it by its CBV 2.0 hash, and appends it to a store nothing rewrites. What follows stands on those mechanics.

Whatever the setting, the mechanics underneath this topic are the same four moves: an event is captured at a door, validated against GS1's official EPCIS 2.0 schema, identified by the CBV 2.0 §8.9 hash of its own content, and appended to a store nothing can rewrite. The variations between industries and use cases are vocabulary — the CBV's business steps and dispositions — not architecture.

Ten years of vendor XML has a path forward: EPCIS 1.1, 1.2 and 2.0 XML in, EPCIS 2.0 JSON-LD out, with a round-trip fidelity report per job so the translation is something you review rather than something you trust. That translator answers at POST /translate on this origin.

The same door answers people and agents. Capture, query, get_event, trace and translate are exposed over MCP, so a logistics agent captures and queries with the same key a person would use, without a human copying values between two systems.

Provenance: an aged epcis.dev page, kept at its original URL and refreshed into the current design on 15 August 2026.

Proof, not adjectives. The gateway's conformance tests pass against GS1's normative artifacts, and the calculators answer on this origin — POST /translate, /validate, /hash, no key. The dated ledger is What ships today.